RE: KitchenAid Refrigerator(s) Model KSCS25FKSS00, SS01, SS02, and all 25 cu/in. counter-depth models built 2001 or later.
Warning: To ALL owners of this specific model...and comparable models be VERY fore-warned.
I spent 2 hours last eve(17JAN2007) on the phone with "techs @ Whirlpool/Kitchenaid[WK].
This model (G_D knows how many other comparable models) are time-bombs!!! In my detailed/lenghty convo with WK
I learned the following:
1) Even the experienced techies will claim ignorance to the now publicly-known "door wiring harness, breaking-wire fault" problem. It IS a known issue 'mongst the water-cooler set. That's NOT the only issue here...sorry to say.
2) Whirlpool/Kitchenaid [WK] NOT unlike many manufacturers, follow a policy wherein, original bad/dysfunctional "parts" are replaced by "OEM" parts. In this process, part revisions/corrections are made and the original parts are listed as "obsolete."
This "slight-of-hand" approach allows the Original CompositeProduct Manufacturer to re-design/correct initial design flaws, offer necessary/important component "upgrades" and affords manufacturers like [WK] the license to forego recalls or Technical Upgrade Advisaries - because the product is no longer "ORIGINAL."
The problem lies in that until and when component fails (customarily OUT OF WARRANTY), the consumer pays for all services - INCLUDING PARTS and then...ugh labor! - despite the manufacturer's internal knowledge of flaws - in advance of the failure. There is NO requisite accountability or remorse with regard to the significant oversight on the part of the Whirlpool/Kitchenaid design/engineering/management teams.
3) I personally take issue with an intriguing component failure.
I've been without the service of my KSCS25FK**** for 3 weeks now. Two servicepersons later, a replaced evaporator fan motor & wiring harness, thermistors AND compressor check; I've been advised that the problem lies with the "box"...i.e. the Inverter Box (#17 on most diagrams). Mustering as much patience as possible, I agreed to contact [WK] directly.
Sears, Appliancerepair.com, repairclinic.com, all had the same reference number listed (8201670) as the replacement part # for Original part # 2209324. Upon receipt of the part, my 3RD serviceman advised that the component was NOT compatible.
Since I'm in NO position to pay for or have patience to tolerate yet another service call - I insisted on answers. I eventually was able to speak with a technician @ [WK]. THEY were shocked & apologetic to learn - that because of my inquiry - they'd realized a "terrible" mistake.... They had issued an INCORRECT replacement part number(8201670 built-in models) for original part 2209324(counter-depth models)!!! To make matters worse, they advised that'll take some time to find the proper replacement AND will have to review all specs before advising/providing me the PROPER replacement part number!
4) While in conversation, I asked as to the "tech knowledge base" re: frequent concerns/flaws with this product. I was advised there were NO concerns regarding any of the counter-depth, KS+ models of KitchenAid refrigerators.
BASED on this website alone...I BEG TO DIFFER !!!
5) I was advised that original part number 2221536 (Control Board -Schematic 36) has been replaced with OEM part #4389211 - second revision. This component, also listed as obsolete, corrects a previous problem with "ice-balling by reducing the number of relays on board."
Again, EXCUSE ME!!! IF there is a KNOWN defect why not alert the consumer?????
Well, I've vented long enough. Thanks for you patience in advance. I'm currently awaiting revised product info - direct from [WK]. I DID notify Sears Parts & sundry repair clinics of the mistake...and, alas, must obey the laws of current-day politics. They didn't believe, and would check into the error....RIGHT AWAY....right! Guess I'll just accept the givens....they wouldn't lie to me...again.....Would They?
Just in case, watch for my next post.
Please respond if any of this touches a nerve with you & your experiences!
J.
J, January 2007