I know this is an old thread but it is still a relevant topic: Just to make things clear - when you pay for a Sky+ subscription, you are paying for the functionality of Sky+. Once cancelled, they take that functionality away. However, the gripe that people have is that the BOX is designed to be able to record, pause, rewind, etc. People are not asking to receive anything illegally, or to receive extra Sky+ options for free. They simply want the box to do what it is designed to do as a piece of hardware. Let's play devil's advocate here and so that okay, since Sky are providing the front end for the EPG (which they, incidentally, don't own) then they can reserve the right to restrict the functions of said front end. Fair enough, but once you cancel your subscription you can't even MANUALLY record on your box, basically rendering any and all recording functions useless. To manually record on the box that you own and have paid for is absolutely nothing to do with Sky and they have no right to restrict you from doing so. It's just a pity that no-one has tested this in court yet, as this would seem to be in clear violation of the law
Meme, April 2011